AI has moved rapidly from hype into adoption. McKinsey’s 2025 Global AI Survey shows 88% of organisations now use AI in at least one function, yet few have scaled. Employees are increasingly turning to AI for availability, speed, and idea generation, even as trust and familiarity vary. As capability gaps widen and user expectations shift, the risk of waiting now exceeds the risk of early experimentation. Leaders who move early gain the learning cycles, cultural alignment, and architectural influence that cannot be retrofitted later.
Across industries, leaders hesitate for a mix of reasons. Some underestimated AI as hype, others lacked confidence or understanding, and many believed they needed perfect conditions before acting: clean data, stable systems, full clarity.
However, McKinsey’s 2025 Global AI Survey shows adoption is broad while maturity remains shallow. This hesitation, therefore, creates structural risk: competitors accumulate learning cycles, vendor dependency grows, and internal capability lags. Inaction has become the most expensive strategic posture available.
Caution is rational. AI is noisy, vendor claims are inflated, and data maturity varies. Yet Microsoft’s 2025 Work Trend Index shows employees already turning to AI for availability, speed, and idea generation, acting ahead of formal strategy. The conditions leaders seek — stability, clarity, and maturity — will not arrive before competitors move. These pressures make hesitation understandable, but increasingly untenable.
AI’s hype cycle was short, intense, noisy, and exploratory. Gartner’s 2025 Hype Cycle places generative AI in the Trough of Disillusionment, marking a shift away from inflated expectations and toward scalable foundations such as data readiness, governance, and ModelOps.
This is why now is the right time to act.
We understand far more today about what generative AI can and cannot do. Early adopters have already uncovered pitfalls, constraints, and failure modes. Their lessons are available for others to learn from rather than repeat. Organisations entering now can set clearer expectations, be more realistic in their goals, and more disciplined in identifying where AI genuinely adds value.
AI is no longer speculative; it is infrastructural. It is embedded across platforms such as Microsoft 365 Copilot, Salesforce Einstein GPT, SAP Joule, and ServiceNow GenAI. The opportunity is to move with clarity while the landscape is better understood and the cost of missteps is lower.
Waiting in the hype phase was understandable. Waiting in the clarity phase is costly.
Consumer adoption of generative AI has rapidly reshaped how people perceive and expect technology to work. Millions now use AI tools at home for planning, writing, troubleshooting, learning, and creative problem-solving, and a recent University of Melbourne and KPMG study found that 66% of people use AI regularly. This widespread familiarity means employees increasingly enter the workplace with confidence, curiosity, and an expectation that comparable tools will be available to support their work.
As consumer-grade AI becomes normalised, tolerance for enterprise lag will shrink. Employees naturally compare internal systems with the convenience, speed, and responsiveness they experience in their personal lives, and the gap between those experiences becomes more visible.
This creates a rare window of goodwill. Right now, users accept imperfections because they understand the technology is still evolving and they want to be part of that evolution. As expectations mature, this patience will diminish. The least resistant moment to adopt AI is now — while employees are motivated, adaptable, and eager for enterprise tools that match their consumer experiences.
Accenture’s Technology Vision 2025 shows only ~36% of organisations have scaled GenAI, yet early adopters compound advantage through learning. McKinsey’s 2025 research highlights structured experimentation as the defining behaviour of successful AI organisations.
Honda entered the competitive US motorcycle market before it was fully prepared, struggling at first with mismatched products. But by observing customers and adapting quickly, rather than waiting for perfect condition, it learned its way into market dominance. Tesla followed a similar pattern, gaining a real-world data advantage despite ongoing debate over safety outcomes.
The leaders were not the most prepared; they were the most adaptive.
This is not a call for sweeping transformation. It is a call for deliberate, low-risk movement that builds organisational intelligence. By starting small and focused, leaders generate the learning cycles that improve data fitness, reveal real opportunities, strengthen internal capability, and reduce long-term risk. A prudent approach emphasises controlled, evidence-based movement: targeted pilots, capability building, governance shaped through real use, and continuous refinement based on results rather than theory. This is strategic discipline, not experimentation for its own sake.
Early action creates structural benefits that cannot be recreated later: influence over architecture, vendor leverage, a more capable workforce, earlier cost takeout, clearer value attribution, accelerated adoption curves, and reduced long-term transformation effort. Early adopters compress future timelines by building organisational intelligence sooner.
Delaying adoption increases technical debt, vendor dependency, cultural resistance, and difficulty attracting AI‑literate talent. By the time conditions feel “ready,” capability gaps have hardened and catching up becomes structurally difficult.
AI will reshape the organisation whether leaders guide the shift or inherit it. Small, intentional steps minimise risk while maximising learning, capability, and credibility. Leadership is demonstrated not by waiting for perfect conditions but by creating the conditions in which the organisation can win.
Start small. Start controlled. Start intentional. And start now.
At this stage, the greatest proven gains from generative AI are in personal productivity. Conservative data shows AI tools routinely unlock one to two hours of productive capacity per employee per day across teams through faster drafting, summarisation, research, and task automation. These benefits alone outweigh the cost of tools like Copilot, often by an order of magnitude.
More importantly, personal productivity is the safest and most practical entry point into AI. It requires no major transformation, system integration, or organisational redesign. It delivers immediate ROI while building the skills, confidence, and cultural readiness that larger AI initiatives depend on.
Giving employees Copilot is not just a technology decision; it is the simplest, lowest‑risk way to begin creating enterprise‑wide momentum.
For organisations already using Microsoft 365, enabling Copilot is the fastest and lowest‑risk way to unlock these productivity gains and begin building capability.
Beyond immediate ROI, enabling employees to use generative AI within a controlled, enterprise‑managed environment is one of the most effective ways to build organisational capability. It allows people to learn how AI behaves with real work, safely and incrementally, without exposing the organisation to unmanaged tools or shadow AI. And once employees begin using AI across daily tasks, recurring needs, pain points, and opportunities emerge; revealing where AI can add value beyond personal productivity.
In practice, Copilot becomes both a productivity accelerator and a discovery engine, surfacing the next wave of operational and enterprise‑level use cases long before formal programs would identify them. It gives leaders a clear, evidence‑based path for what comes after Copilot.
Starting with Copilot is not only the fastest way to capture value; it is also the lowest‑risk path into AI adoption.
Organisations that leap straight into large-scale AI programs frequently encounter cost overruns, stalled pilots, unrealistic expectations, and low adoption. Starting with Copilot avoids these traps, creating capability, clarity, and confidence before bigger commitments are made.
The evidence is clear: the greatest early gains from generative AI are happening at the individual level — in personal productivity, accelerated thinking, and reduced low‑value work. Employees are already overcoming real constraints using AI tools, even when organisations have not formally equipped them.
So give your employees Copilot. Give them access, give them permission, and give them guardrails, and let them get started.
Enabling people to use AI directly is the fastest, safest way to build organisational capability. It creates learning cycles, reveals genuine opportunities, and builds confidence long before major transformation programs are required.
The organisations that lead in this next era will be those that empower their workforce early, not those that wait for perfection. Let your people begin.
If you’re ready to discuss your goals, reach out to us via the form and one of our team members will be in contact with you.
Alternatively, drop us a query or an expression of interest at: operations@rmkble.com.au.
Rmkble family businesses
